« Back to Intelligence Feed Prebendalism: Tinubu is ‘governing’ for the few, not the many! By Olu Fasan

Prebendalism: Tinubu is ‘governing’ for the few, not the many! By Olu Fasan

ABI Analysis · Nigeria macro Sentiment: -0.85 (very_negative) · 19/03/2026
Nigeria's political economy has entered a critical phase under President Bola Ahmed Tinubu's administration, characterized by what scholars term "prebendalism"—the distribution of state resources to political loyalists rather than through merit-based or transparent mechanisms. This governance model, while not entirely new to Nigerian politics, has intensified in ways that carry significant implications for the continent's largest economy and for European investors operating within its markets. The Tinubu presidency, which commenced in May 2023, has demonstrated patterns consistent with patronage-driven governance. Key ministerial appointments, contract awards, and policy implementations appear to prioritize political affiliation and personal networks over institutional capacity or competitive merit. This approach stands in stark contrast to the technocratic governance models that international investors typically expect in emerging markets, and it represents a departure from earlier promises of institutional reform. For context, prebendalism in Nigerian politics is not unprecedented. However, the scale and brazenness of resource allocation under the current administration have drawn criticism from civil society, academia, and international observers. The concentration of decision-making power within a narrow circle of loyalists has created bottlenecks in policy execution and reduced institutional predictability—precisely the factors that European investors assess when evaluating long-term commitment to African markets. The implications for

Continue reading this analysis

Become an ABI Supporter to unlock all articles, reports and investment opportunities.

Subscribe — €10/year

Already a member? Log in

Gateway Intelligence
European investors should implement heightened governance risk protocols when evaluating new Nigerian opportunities, including independent assessments of regulatory capture risks and local partnership stability. Consider increasing allocations to sectors with lower political dependency (technology, consumer goods, agriculture) while reducing exposure to government-concession-dependent sectors until institutional transparency improves. Monitor the 2025 budget execution and central bank independence as leading indicators of governance trajectory; sustained patronage patterns will likely trigger downgrades from rating agencies, directly impacting borrowing costs and currency stability.

Subscribe to read the full Gateway Intelligence insight

Unlock Full Access — €10/year

Sources: Vanguard Nigeria

More from Nigeria

🇳🇬 What Nigeria can learn from Ghana and South Africa as it drafts its AI strategy

tech·19/03/2026

🇳🇬 South Africa on track to overtake Nigeria as Africa’s largest economy in 2024 — IMF - Mariblock

macro·19/03/2026

🇳🇬 Let’s cut Tinubu some slack, by Ikechukwu Amaechi

macro·19/03/2026

More macro Intelligence

🇿🇦 IMF urges sweeping business reforms to unlock South Africa’s growth and job creation - IOL

South Africa·19/03/2026

🇿🇦 South Africa's economy grows 0.4% q/q in fourth quarter - TradingView

South Africa·19/03/2026

🇰🇪 Why Ruto’s 'Singapore dream' is hard to realise

Kenya·19/03/2026