DAAR Communications denies approving shareholding changes

DAAR Communications Plc (ticker: DAARCOMM), a diversified Nigerian media and telecommunications conglomerate listed on the Nigerian Exchange (NGX), has formally rejected claims that its board approved changes to the company's shareholding structure, escalating a corporate governance dispute that raises critical questions about regulatory oversight in Africa's largest equity market.

The denial follows a discrepancy between DAAR's internal board records and filings with the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC), Nigeria's primary business registration authority. Such misalignments are rare in publicly listed companies and signal potential control shifts that could materially affect minority shareholder interests and valuation.

### What triggered the shareholding dispute?

DAAR's board statement explicitly clarified that no formal approval has been granted for any structural changes to ownership stakes, nor have such modifications been executed through the statutory processes required under Nigerian corporate law. The company's emphasis on "applicable statutory processes"—a reference to the Companies and Allied Matters Act (CAMA) 2020—underscores the seriousness of the allegation. Any undisclosed change in controlling interest must be reported to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) within mandatory timelines. Failure to comply triggers delisting risk and potential director liability.

The CAC discrepancy is particularly concerning because the commission serves as the authoritative registry for all corporate structures in Nigeria. If CAC records show shareholding changes that DAAR's board denies approving, one of two scenarios has occurred: either CAC data is erroneous (unlikely but possible), or unauthorized filings were submitted—pointing to fraud or gross negligence by officers with filing authority.

### Why does this matter for NSE investors?

Shareholding transparency is foundational to equity market confidence. Institutional investors, pension funds, and retail shareholders rely on CAC and NGX disclosures to assess control dynamics, related-party transaction risk, and dividend policy stability. If a majority shareholder changes hands without proper disclosure, minority holders face sudden exposure to new management, altered strategic direction, and potential asset stripping.

DAAR Communications operates across media (broadcasting, print) and telecoms—sectors with political sensitivity in Nigeria. Control transitions in such entities carry regulatory and reputational implications that directly affect stock performance. The company's denial, while legally prudent, does not resolve the underlying CAC anomaly; instead, it amplifies investor uncertainty.

### How will regulators respond?

The NGX and SEC must now conduct formal investigations into CAC records versus DAAR's board minutes. The timeline is critical: shareholding disputes that linger unresolved erode market confidence and invite further corporate governance lapses. Precedent suggests the SEC will demand that DAAR file a clarification statement within 48 hours, with supporting documentation of all board resolutions and shareholder authorizations. The CAC must simultaneously audit its filing records to identify the source of the discrepancy.

Until resolution, DAARCOMM stock faces heightened volatility. Institutional investors may reduce exposure pending clarity, while activist shareholders could demand an emergency general meeting to ratify or reject any unannounced changes.

---

##