The US must urgently learn from Africa

Tanzania's government has signaled a decisive shift in fiscal policy, with President Samia Suluhu Hassan committing to a comprehensive overhaul of the country's tax administration system. This development marks a critical turning point for the East African economy, which has faced mounting investor skepticism over the past three years due to inconsistent tax enforcement, frequent regulatory changes, and disputes between the Tanzania Revenue Authority (TRA) and multinational enterprises.

The context is essential for understanding the urgency. Tanzania's investment climate deteriorated notably following 2022, when the TRA pursued aggressive retrospective tax audits against major foreign operators in mining, telecommunications, and manufacturing. Several European-headquartered companies faced unexpected assessments exceeding tens of millions of dollars, with disputes dragging through administrative and judicial channels. This unpredictability created a chilling effect: FDI inflows to Tanzania declined from $1.2 billion (2021) to approximately $820 million (2023), according to UNCTAD data.

The TRA itself has acknowledged systemic inefficiencies. Compliance officers across sectors reported opaque assessment criteria, inconsistent guidance on transfer pricing, and what many described as "revenue maximization" rather than "revenue optimization" culture within the authority. European investors—particularly those in extractive industries and financial services—began redirecting capital to more transparent jurisdictions like Kenya and Rwanda, where tax codes are clearer and dispute resolution faster.

President Hassan's commitment to tax system reform addresses three critical areas investors have flagged: *clarity*, *consistency*, and *due process*. Reports suggest the overhaul will include modernization of the TRA's IT infrastructure (currently fragmented across legacy systems), clearer advance ruling mechanisms for complex transactions, and stricter timelines for assessment completion. These are not cosmetic changes—they directly reduce the administrative burden and litigation risk that European firms cite as barriers to expansion.

What's remarkable is the implicit admission that the previous approach damaged competitiveness. Tanzania competes against Uganda, Kenya, and South Africa for regional FDI. While Tanzania holds advantages—lower labor costs, substantial natural resource endowments, and a growing consumer market of 60+ million—regulatory certainty is table stakes for institutional capital. The reform signals policymakers understand this.

For European investors, the timing matters. Implementation typically takes 12-18 months in African contexts. Early movers who expand operations during the reform transition—particularly in agribusiness, renewable energy, and light manufacturing—may negotiate more favorable terms with a TRA eager to demonstrate improved business-friendliness. Conversely, those burned by previous disputes face genuine reconsideration: Is the commitment credible, or political positioning?

The mining sector deserves particular attention. Tanzania hosts significant gold reserves, and European precious metals refiners, equipment suppliers, and finance providers all have exposure. Tax predictability directly impacts project IRRs. If the overhaul succeeds, we may see renewed interest in Tanzanian mining development—especially as ESG-conscious European investors seek African supply chain alternatives to conflict zones.

The risk: reform rollout could be uneven. Regional TRA offices may resist centralized guidance. Political transitions (next elections: 2025) could undermine continuity. But the trajectory is undeniably positive compared to 2023's climate of distrust.

---

#